Skip to content

Blog

Red Light Therapy for Anti Aging

Red Light Therapy for Anti Aging

Light therapy (also known as photobiomodulation) is the application of light with specific wavelengths to the body for the purposes of influencing biology. The most common form of light therapy uses red light, which is visible as the color red, and/or near infrared light, which is not visible but can be felt as heat. Blue light is also often used in light therapy for skin conditions. Different colors of light have different depths of skin penetration, with red light and near infrared light penetrating the deepest.  Light therapy can support skin health in a variety of different ways. Through its effects on mitochondria, light therapy can increase cellular energy production and modulate oxidative stress. In the skin, this increased energy can be used to support normal processes such as collagen and elastin production. And by modulating ROS production and oxidative stress, there is a shift towards skin rejuvenation rather than skin breakdown. The anti-aging effects of light therapy are often referred to as “skin rejuvenation”. This includes outcomes like increased collagen synthesis, increased elastin production, extracellular matrix regeneration, regulation of oil production, and regulation of the pigment producing cells of the skin. Clinically, these manifest as reduced wrinkles, improved skin appearance, and improved skin pigmentation. Studies show results such as smoother skin, wrinkle reduction and improved skin elasticity, and normalization of skin pigmentation. The effect of red light therapy on wrinkles can be quite dramatic, with one study showing a 30% decrease in eye wrinkle volume. Most skin rejuvenation studies use both red and near infrared light. Importantly, the use of light therapy to regenerate skin is gentle and “non-ablative”, which means that it doesn’t harm the epidermis of the skin and require downtime for healing. This contrasts with many popular anti-aging treatments such as microneedling, chemical peels, and microdermabrasion, which stimulative collagen synthesis and improve appearance by damaging and resurfacing the outer layer of the skin.  At Fringe, we view aging as something to be embraced and supported using natural therapies, which is why we developed  the Fringe red light face mask. Our mask is hands free, wireless, and uses 234 hard working LED light chips to deliver red and near infrared light to the entire face. It also has the option to deliver blue light if blemishes are a problem. Use the healing power of light and treat yourself to healthy, radiant looking skin in the comfort of your own home! For more information about Fringe light products, go to: https://fringeheals.com/shop-all-products/

Learn more
Light Therapy for Acne

Light Therapy for Acne

Red & Blue Light for Acne Red and near infrared light therapy is the application of artificially generated light in the red and near infrared spectral bands. Other forms of light therapy include light in the blue spectrum, which is often used in light therapy for skin conditions. Blue light has the shortest wavelength, red light is intermediate, and near infrared light wavelengths are the longest. Different colors of light have different depths of skin penetration, with red and near infrared penetrating the deepest. Blue light from light therapy devices mimics the blue light generated from the sun, without any harmful UV rays. In contrast, artificial blue light generated from electronic devices has different spectral properties and can be harmful to the skin. Red, near infrared, and blue light have all been found to effectively treat acne. Acne is a common skin condition, affecting nearly 10% of people worldwide. Prevalence is highest in adolescents, with up to 85% having acne at some time during this period. Acne is not only painful, but it can also have adverse effects on many aspects of life, including social, psychological, and economic. Since acne has been observed to respond positively to sun exposure, a variety of treatment approaches using light therapy have been used. Light therapy for acne is treated in a variety of ways. Molecules in the skin called porphyrins absorb blue light which has antimicrobial effects that kill the bacteria associated with acne. Red and near infrared light also have antimicrobial effects but work via a different mechanism. The longer light wavelengths also reduce the activity of sebaceous glands, which are responsible for oil production. Treatment with blue, red, and near infrared light has been found to effectively treat acne, especially when used in combination.  The Fringe Red Light Face Mask delivers both red and near infrared light as well as blue light to support skin health, including the treatment of acne. Made of soft silicone and battery powered, the mask is comfortable to wear and easy to use. The mask has three modes of use, which can deliver blue, red, or red and near/infrared. These can be combined in sequence for exposure to multiple wavelengths. Our recommended treatment protocol of light therapy for acne is to use blue daily and follow this with red/near infrared 3 to 4 times per week.   For more information about Fringe light products, go to: https://fringeheals.com/shop-all-products/

Learn more
Light Therapy for the Lymphatic System

Light Therapy for the Lymphatic System

What is the lymphatic system? Of all the systems of the body, the lymphatic system is probably the most underappreciated and misunderstood. Many people have never even heard of it, and of those who have, most don’t really know what it does. Even medical doctors report that their understanding of the lymphatic system is “suboptimal”, and that the teaching of this system and its associated diseases in medical school was insufficient. Anatomically, the lymphatic system can be thought of as a network of vessels and organs that carry a clear fluid called lymph. The system largely travels alongside the system of blood vessels in the body. The lymphatic system includes hundreds of lymph nodes, which can sometimes be felt superficially in regions like the neck, armpit and groin. The tonsils are considered lymph nodes, but due to their size are sometimes referred to as lymphoid organs. Other lymphoid organs include the bone marrow, spleen and thymus. Lymphoid organs produce cells called lymphocytes, which are immune cells. The lymphocytes are carried in the lymphatic fluid throughout the body.  The lymphatic fluid (or lymph) is mostly produced by liver and intestines. In addition to lymphocytes, lymph also carries fat, proteins, and pathogens. It can also carry cancer cells, making the lymphatic system a potential route for cancer metastasis. This is why it is standard practice to biopsy lymph nodes near a tumor to determine if the cancer has spread. Lymph flows in one direction, upwards towards the neck, which requires the vessels to have one-way valves that prevent backflow and a pumping system that involves both extrinsic and intrinsic forces. Extrinsic forces include skeletal muscle contractions, while intrinsic forces involve contractions of lymphatic muscle cells. When pumping is impaired, lymph fluid will accumulate (usually in the extremities) and cause swelling, also referred to as edema.   The lymph composition reflects the functions of the lymphatic system. These include: (1) carrying out many activities of the immune system (such defending against invading pathogens), (2) transporting and absorbing fats and fat-soluble vitamins, (3) maintaining fluid balance, and (4) removing cellular waste, which is recycled by the liver. These functions are essential to maintaining health, and impairment of lymphatic system function can cause a wide range of problems including (but not limited to) lymphedema (tissue swelling), autoimmune diseases, and cancer. The lymphatic system can ultimately be viewed as inseparable from the immune system, although it also has additional roles that make it distinct. It can also be thought of as a “subsystem” of the circulatory system, because it absorbs plasma that escapes from the blood and that contains important nutrients which are returned to the bloodstream through lymphatic vessels. Lymphatic vessels dump directly into the circulatory system through the venous system. This happens in the neck, where the lymph dumps into vessels such as the subclavian vein. Between 8 and 12 litres of fluid per day is returned to the blood through the lymphatic system.  Although it was previously thought that the lymphatic system was not found in the brain, a network of brain lymphatic vessels was recently identified. These vessels are found in the meninges, which make up the outer three layers of the brain and spinal cord. Meningeal lymphatics drain cerebrospinal fluid (which surrounds the brain) into lymph nodes in the neck and help to clear waste out of the brain. It is also a “pipeline” for immune cells. The lymphatic system in the brain has been termed the “glymphatic system” and is especially active during sleep. This system has been linked to brain diseases such as dementia, including Alzheimer’s.  There are many ways to support lymphatic system health, such as with exercise and massage, which support the flow of lymph. Lymphatic system health is also supported by minimizing the intake of toxins through food, water, and the environment. Another supportive tool is red light therapy, which has recently been identified as an effective way to optimize the health of the lymphatic system and can be done at home using devices including panels and wraps. What is red light therapy? The term “red light therapy” usually describes the use of both red and near infrared light, although only the red light produced by the device is visible to the naked eye. Infrared light can still be perceived by the body as heat when it contacts skin. Red and near infrared light therapy is the application of artificially generated light in the red and near infrared spectral bands.  Red and near infrared light are naturally produced by the sun, which gives off solar radiation. The term radiation describes energy that is transmitted in the form of waves or particles. The spectrum of light in our environment consists of both light we can see (visible light) and light that our eyes can’t perceive (invisible light). This is called the electromagnetic spectrum. The visible light spectrum is quite narrow, consisting of wavelengths that range from 400 to 700nm and span from violet to red in color. Red light is part of this visible light spectrum, while near infrared light is not. While early research on light therapy used primarily lasers, more recent research has found that LED’s can also be used, which also have the advantage of applying light to a larger area of the body as well as an improved safety profile. The use of LED in red/near infrared light therapy devices has also greatly reduced the cost of treatment, making it something that can be done in the comfort of one’s own home.  What is the evidence that that red light therapy affects the lymphatic system? Before we dive into looking at some of the general mechanisms by which red light therapy affects the lymphatic system, let’s look at some of the research evidence that specifically demonstrates the utility of red light in treating disease via lymphatic system modulation. While this is a very new area of research, many compelling studies have shown red light therapy to be helpful in improving the function of this important system. Glymphatic System – The glymphatic system of the brain is a key player in diseases of the brain, including dementia, Alzheimer’s, and Parkinson’s disease. The ability to clear waste from the brain is described as the glymphatic system’s “most central” function – which means that waste buildup will result when the system is impaired. Glymphatic system function declines with age and because of disease and trauma, such as stroke and traumatic brain injury. It is critical to brain health to support glymphatic function.  Red light therapy was recently described as “a non-invasive neuroprotective strategy for maintaining and optimizing effective brain waste clearance” via the glymphatic system. As evidence, near infrared light has been shown to activate the glymphatic system in the brains of diabetic mice. Similarly, in animal models of Alzheimer’s Disease, application of both red and near infrared light increases glymphatic system activity and results in clearance of amyloid, which is a toxic protein. Red light therapy has been shown to be improve symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia in humans, and although these studies have not specifically looked at glymphatic function, it is likely that it is affected.  Red light therapy has also been shown to improve glymphatic system function in brain injuries. In rats with experimentally induced intraventricular hemorrhage (which mimics stroke), application of near infrared light increases lymphatic drainage and speeds the rate of recovery. And in ex-football players suffering from chronic traumatic encephalitis, application of near infrared light caused lymphatic vessels in the brain to dilate, which would be expected to increase flow and clearance of waste from the brain. Since this system is particularly active during sleep, using red light therapy during sleep or in the evenings might be most helpful.  Lyphedema – Lymphedema is swelling that occurs because of lymph buildup. This usually happens in the legs or arms, but it can occur in other areas as well. Primary lymphedema is a result of a problem present from birth, while secondary lymphedema is acquired, usually from an infection, cancer, or as a consequence of cancer treatment. The underlying cause of lymphedema is disruption of the lymphatic system, which prevents the proper flow and drainage of lymph. Lymphedema is usually chronic and progressive, and symptoms can greatly affect quality of life. Most research on red light therapy and lymphedema has focused on breast cancer patients. Breast cancer treatment often involves removal of lymph nodes from around the breast, and/or radiation, which can disrupt the flow of lymph out of the arm. In a review of nine studies using red light therapy to treat breast cancer related lymphedema, overall, both a reduction in size of the affected arm and pain was achieved. Eight studies used near infrared light while one used red light, and all but one study specified directing the light therapy to the armpit region. Three studies also targeted other areas on the arm. The observed reduction in arm size was expected to be clinically meaningful. Red light therapy may also reduce lymphedema of the head and neck. Lymphedema in this area is usually caused by radiation in patients with head and neck cancers. Lymphedema here can be very problematic, causing problems with eating and swallowing. Red light therapy may help to reduce edema in the area, as well as to improve the condition of the skin.  Inflammation – Inflammation is a hallmark of many diseases currently ravaging modern society, such as arthritis, ulcerative colitis, inflammatory bowel disease, heart disease, diabetes, cancer, Alzheimer’s Disease, and depression. Inflammation is also associated with acute diseases involving the heart, pancreas, liver, and other organs, as well as trauma and infection. Treatment of inflammation associated diseases makes up the majority of health care spending in the US, costing billions of dollars annually. The lymphatic system plays a key role in regulating inflammation, and increased activity of the lymphatic system has been associated with reduced inflammation since it helps to remove excess fluid. Red light therapy’s ability to decrease inflammation has been well-established. As described by Dr. Michael Hamblin, former Associate Professor at Harvard Medical School, “one of the most reproducible effects of is an overall reduction of inflammation”. Studies have found that light therapy affects levels of many molecules involved in inflammation, including reactive oxygen species, reactive nitrogen species, and prostaglandins. Light therapy has even been found to reduce inflammation in the brain, known as neuroinflammation.  Although the role of the lymphatic system in inflammation is well established, most studies using red light therapy to decrease inflammation have not specifically assessed its effect on the lymphatic system. However, when this relationship was investigated, it was found that application of near infrared light to lymph nodes caused a decrease in inflammation and related swelling.  How does red light therapy affect the lymphatic system? Clearly, red light therapy has many positive effects on the lymphatic system of the body and the glymphatic system of the brain. Research on precisely how red and near infrared light mediate these benefits is not extensive, but there are several general mechanisms that have been identified. Relaxing Lymphatic Vessels – Red light therapy can induce the relaxation of lymphatic vessels. This happens through a process called vasodilation.  When lymphatic vessels are more relaxed, the flow of lymph is increased. This has been observed experimentally to occur in the glymphatic system of the brain. In the brain, increased vasodilation may allow larger molecules (such as the amyloid protein) to pass into the lymph, improving the clearance of waste. Vasodilation may be due to increased production of nitric oxide, which could act on smooth muscle cells that are the “motor unit” of lymphatic drainage.  New Lymphatic Vessel Synthesis - Lymphangiogenesis is the process of formation of new lymphatic vessels. In a mouse model of lymphedema, application of red light therapy induced lymphangiogenesis, suggesting that in conditions where lymph flow is impaired due to lymphatic system damage, red light therapy may restore function by supporting the production of new lymphatic vessels.  Activating Mitochondria – Mitochondria are found in cells throughout the lymphatic system. Mitochondria are right in molecules called chromophores, which absorb light. Specifically, red and near infrared light stimulate cytochrome c oxidase, a mitochondrial enzyme that produces ATP, the energy currency of the cell. This increases ATP synthesis which provides more energy to cells throughout the lymphatic system. Rd light therapy has been shown to modulate oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species production, which might improve the function of lymphatic system cells.  Stimulating Lymphoid Organs – Lymphoid organs are affected by aging, which leads to impaired functioning of the immune system and increases susceptibility to illness. This primarily affects the thymus gland, which is found in the upper chest behind the sternum. Application of red light therapy to the thymus through the chest wall may support thymus health and decrease age associated changes and could perhaps support thymus function throughout the lifespan. Application of red light therapy to other areas, such as lymph nodes, may also support lymphatic system function through tissue stimulation. How do I choose a red light device to affect the lymphatic system? For at home use of red light therapy, the majority of products (especially the affordable ones) will use LED lights, rather than laser. While early light therapy research was done using lasers, LED lights have become much more popular over the last decade. In 2018, Dr. Michael Hamblin – the world’s leading light therapy expert – concluded that LED lights using comparable parameters to lasers performed “equally well”, which is very important because LED powered light therapy devices can be made at a fraction of the cost of laser devices. Laser powered devices are still a favorite in medical offices, which makes sense given their high cost and higher risk of adverse effects such as skin irritation. Red light products on the market vary quite a bit in terms of their intensity (or power) and the specific wavelengths of light that they deliver. Studies vary in both parameters, and it appears that a range of wavelengths and intensity are beneficial. For maximum versatility, it is recommended to choose a multiwavelength device that provides both red and near infrared light, since each has some unique cellular effects. In terms of intensity, it may be ideal to mimic the intensity of the sun, which is around 24 mW/cm2 at the skin. This is described as the “sweet spot” between higher intensities, which can have harmful effects, and lower intensities, which will have no effect at all. When using red light therapy to support the lymphatic system, choose a sun-mimicking product and don’t overdo it when it comes to treatment frequency and duration. Red light therapy devices come in several forms, many of which can be used to support the lymphatic system. Red light LED panels can be used to treat most body parts, including the face, chest and back. Panels provide broad coverage but do require you to stay stationary and seated during the treatment. Panels are a good choice for directing light at the lymphatics in the neck and upper chest, around the thymus gland. If you would prefer to lie down while doing a treatment, you would do better with a portable LED wrap rather than an LED panel. Portable devices are also the best choice if you would like to have the option of moving around during your treatment. Portable red light wraps can comfortably be used on most body parts except the head and neck. Red light wraps that are specifically designed for the head are the best option for targeting the glymphatic system in the brain, although this system can also be supported with an LED panel. Every person’s needs are unique, but there are many different device options to choose from.   Conclusion Red light therapy can be used at home to support the health of the lymphatic system. Research has demonstrated that it is a safe and effective treatment for a range of disorders, such as dementia, lymphedema, and inflammation. By improving the structure and function of lymphatic vessels, red light therapy increases the flow of lymph. This may be especially important in the brain, where waste buildup can cause serious illness such as Alzheimer’s disease. Choosing the right product is easy: Select a red light panel or wrap that delivers red and near infrared light, mimics the intensity of the sun, and fits into your lifestyle.  For more information about Fringe light products, go to: https://fringeheals.com/shop-all-products/

Learn more
What is Earthing?

What is Earthing?

Earthing means connecting the body to the earth’s surface electric charge. Earthing is said to be a form of “electric nutrition” and a “universal regulating factor in Nature” because research has shown that it has a profound impact on human health (Menigoz et al., 2020). In fact, the simple act of regular contact with the earth has been shown to positively influence immune function, enhance muscle healing, improve bone health, reduce blood pressure, increase blood flow, enhance nervous system functioning, and improve sleep and mood. The earthing movement came out of Germany in the late 19th century and promoted sleeping on the ground outdoors and being barefoot outside as ways to achieve health (Just, 1903). In the 1920’s, Dr. G.S. White reported that sleeping on the ground, or connected to the earth such as by copper wire attached to grounded pipes, resulted in improved sleep (White, 1929). However, it wasn’t until the late 20th century that these ideas gained traction, when Clint Ober (Ober, 2000) and Sokal and Sokal (Sokal & Sokal, 2011) in Poland confirmed through research studies that there were many health benefits to being grounded to the earth. Ober, who worked with cable TV, realized this association through his experience with electrical systems, which require contact with the ground in order to be electrically stable. When these systems are connected to the negative charge on the earth’s surface they are said to be “grounded”. The term “grounding” is used synonymously with the term “earthing”. There are two ways to connect to the flow of electrons over the surface of earth: (1) directly, by putting the body in contact with natural conductive surfaces such as grass, soil, gravel, stone and sand; (2) putting the body in contact with grounded conductive mats, pads, body bands, or patches (usually while sitting or sleeping). The earth’s electron flow comes primarily from lightning strikes, solar radiation, and other atmospheric phenomena. These electron sources are continuous and give the earth a natural negative electric charge, since free electrons are negatively charged. (Menigoz et al., 2020). Until quite recently, it was the natural human state to be grounded virtually 24 hours a day. Humans walked barefoot and slept on the ground for most of our evolutionary history. Even when we adapted to wearing footwear and using bedding, it was made from animal skins that when moistened with ground moisture or sweat were able to conduct electrons from the ground to the body. Only recently have we shifted to wearing footwear with synthetic soles, living primarily on top of concrete. In this way, we might be said to be disconnected from our “electric roots” (Sinatra et al., 2017).  The theory of “electron deficiency syndrome” states that as a consequence of the loss of an electric connection to the earth, that a natural source of electron flow to the body has been lost, which will have significant adverse physiological consequences (Oschman et al., 2015). Following this, it is possible that the loss of electric connection to the earth, a relatively recent phenomenon, might underlie (at least in part) the rise in global illness of the 21st and 22nd century (Menigoz et al., 2020). Humans As Bioelectrical Beings The idea that electron flow from the earth may play an important role in regulating human physiology is consistent with our understanding of humans as bioelectrical beings. Internal bioelectric signals regulate the function of the cardiovascular, nervous, immune and endocrine systems. The measurement of the body’s electrical character is called electrophysiology.  The flow of electrons over the surface of the earth can be transferred into the human body through direct contact. Electrons have a negative charge, and in the body, like to occur in pairs. These electrons can act to neutralize free radicals, which have an unpaired electron that makes them unstable. Some free radicals are also known as reactive oxygen species. Free radicals are readily produced in the body and can do damage to surrounding cells and tissues. The free electron of a free radical can be “quenched” by an electron donor, stabilizing it in a pair. This is how antioxidants work – they act as electron donors to neutralize free radicals. In this way, the earth is seen as a giant antioxidant (Menigoz et al., 2020). Probing into this mechanism more deeply, it has been proposed that the electron flow provided by earthing may be able to break through the “inflammatory barricade” that can slow the healing response. This barricade develops in response to trauma or infection and serves to wall off damaged tissues and prevent bacteria, pathogens, or debris that result from an injury from travelling to (and harming) nearby tissues. However, the barricade also prevents treatments like antioxidants from accessing the site of injury, which can reduce the rate of healing. Because the barricade is made of the connective tissue collagen, which is a semi-conductor, electrons are able to cross through and perform their healing antioxidant action at the site of damage. In fact, all proteins act as semi-conductors which could have profound implications for the movement of electrons throughout the body. This may be particularly relevant for chronic inflammatory diseases (Sinatra et al., 2017).  The effect of earthing on the electrical potential of the body has been demonstrated in research. Measurements of the body’s electrical induced fields in the left breast, abdomen, and left thigh were measured while both grounded and ungrounded, and it was found that the measured voltage in the grounded state was equalized with the Earth’s electrical potential. This voltage stayed constant despite the application of an electrical field. In contrast, when ungrounded, the application of an electrical field to the three body positions resulted in a large increase in electrical potential at the surface of the body, which is thought to disturb the electrical charges of molecules inside the body (Applewhite, 2005).  As described by Nobel Prize winner Richard Feynman, when the electric potential of the body is the same as the Earth’s electric potential (which is what has been shown to occur during grounding), the body becomes an extension of the Earth’s electrical system in a phenomenon known as the “umbrella effect”, which results in the person being unaffected by electrical disturbances (Feynman et al., 1963). Earthing has also been shown to result in rapid changes in measures of body electrophysiology as measured by brain electroencephalograms (EEG’s) and muscle electromyograms (EMG’s) (Chevalier et al., 2006). This evidence clearly indicates that the concept of earthing affecting the electrical nature of the body is not merely theoretical.  Effects of Earthing on the Body Immune System: The immune system regulates inflammation. Earthing has been shown to alter the inflammatory response to an injury, especially chronic infection. This is thought to be accomplished by passage of electrons through the inflammatory barricade previously described, which allows for healing following infection and injury. Inflammation has been shown through infrared imaging to decrease within 30 minutes of earthing, which is accompanied by metabolic changes that suggest tissue healing (Oschman et al, 2015). Earthing the human body has also been shown to speed up the immune response following vaccination. This has been demonstrated by measuring levels of immune markers in the blood following vaccination (Sokal & Sokal, 2011). Musculoskeletal System: Earthing helps muscles to recover from exercise. Three studies have shown that earthing is able to reduce delayed onset muscular soreness (DOMS) that occurs 24-72 hours after unusual or strenuous exercise. In the first study, 4 healthy men experienced a reduction in DOMS as well as pain and inflammation compared to a control group (Brown et al., 2010). In the second study, a larger group of 16 healthy men experienced similar effects (Brown et al., 2015). In the third study, subjects slept on an earthing sleep mat and compared to a control group, experienced positive effects such as a faster recovery, decreased inflammation, and less muscle damage (Müller et al., 2019). Earthing during cycling exercise has also been shown to significantly reduce the level of blood urea, which is an indicator of muscle and protein breakdown (Sokal et al., 2013). Based on these findings, it appears that earthing may be a simple and effective method to enhance recovery after exercise, which is important as very few interventions are known to help with DOMS.  Bone health has also been shown to benefit from earthing. After a single night of sleeping grounded, subjects showed decreases in levels of the minerals calcium and phosphorus in both the blood and urine, which suggest a reduced rate of bone loss (Sokal & Sokal, 2011). Cardiovascular System: Earthing has been shown to improve blood flow in adults. Specifically, earthing has been found to increase the Zeta potential of red blood cells. The zeta potential is an indicator of the strength of the negative charge on the surface of red blood cells that helps to maintain the spacing of the blood cells while in the blood, which reduces the “viscosity” or thickness of the blood. When the zeta potential is higher, blood cells repel each other and there is less clumping and improved blood flow. In one study, the zeta potential increased by an average of 270% within two hours of earthing (Chevalier et al, 2013). The relationship of this effect to negative charge, and the speed of the effect, seems to clearly illustrate the electrical influence of earthing on the body.  Earthing has also been shown to reduce blood pressure. In a study of 10 patients with hypertension, all subjects experienced a decrease in blood pressure with earthing. Blood pressure decreased when patients grounded themselves for at least 10 hours per day using a grounding mat. Systolic blood pressure decreased by an average of 14% (Elkin & Winter, 2018). Other cardiovascular related effects have been found with earthing. A placebo-controlled study found an increase in respiration rate, stabilization of blood oxygenation, and an increase in the pulse rate and perfusion index (a measure of blood flow) variability when grounded. These changes are thought to indicate the onset of a healing response that requires an increase in oxygen consumption (Chevalier, 2010). Autonomic Nervous System: Earthing affects the function of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) in both infants and adults. The ANS is responsible for regulating body processes such as heart rate, blood pressure, respiration and digestion. When earthing patches were placed on the skin of premature babies, within minutes increases in heart rate variability (HRV) were observed, which indicate better functioning of the ANS. This may help to reduce the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis, which is severe illness that affects about 10% of premature infants and can cause death (Passi et al., 2017). In adults, earthing has been found to cause a shift from an overactive expression of the sympathetic nervous system (“fight or flight”) to a parasympathetic (“rest and digest”) state that regulates heart rate, respiration, digestion, and other functions (Chevalier, 2010). Earthing also exerts a normalizing effects on levels of the stress-related hormone cortisol (Ghaly & Teplitz, 2004). In this way, earthing has the effect of reducing stress. Skin: Earthing has been found to increase blood flow to the skin. Following earthing, there was a rapid increase in blood flow to the face in a placebo-controlled study in which the control group was given a “sham” earthing experience (Chevalier, 2014). This might explain the results of a survey that found that women reported having better facial complexions after earthing (The Earthing Institute). Increased blood flow to the face, neck and torso has also been shown following earthing (Chevalier, 2015).  The effects of earthing on the skin have also been studied in the context of wound healing. A case study of an 84 year old woman with an eight-month old open wound near her ankle responded dramatically to two weeks of using an earthing patch after several unsuccessful treatments at a specialized wound center (Sinatra et al., 2017). This is consistent with animal research that shows that electric currents increase energy production and protein synthesis in rat skin (Cheng et al., 1982). Sleep: Many people report better sleep with earthing. The first report of improved sleep with grounding came in the 1920’s from Dr. G.S. White (White, 1929). More recently, in a study of 12 participants, 11 subjects reported that they fell asleep faster and all subjects reported fewer nighttime awakenings after 8 weeks. Subjects also showed normalization in their 24-hour profile of cortisol secretion (Ghaly & Teplitz, 2004). Similarly, in a controlled, blinded study of 60 subjects who reported disturbed sleep and chronic muscle and joint pain, the group who slept on the grounded sleep mats reported a wide variety of benefits, including improved sleep and sleep apnea after one month (Ober et al., 2010). Mood: Earthing has been shown to improve mood. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 40 adult men and women, those who spent an hour sitting comfortably in a recliner on a grounded mat, with their head on a grounded pillow, and with grounding patches on their palms and soles showed significantly improved mood compared to the control group, who used the same products that were not grounded. Specifically, participants reported a more pleasant mood, feeling less tired and more relaxed, and feeling more positive (Chevalier, 2015).  Clinical Recommendations Earthing represents an incredibly safe, inexpensive, and effective intervention that can easily be integrated into one’ life. There are three ways that health care providers can recommend earthing to their patients. These are: 1. Earthing outdoors. Sessions of 30-40 minutes daily have been shown to be effective (Sinatra 18). This is also the most inexpensive method of earthing. People can go barefoot outdoors or can buy outdoor conductive footwear. Unfortunately, time and weather may be limiting factors. Also note that in order for electron transfer to occur, one must be on a natural conductive surface, such as soil, sand, gravel, grass or stone. 2. Earthing products. There are a number of grounding products that are available commercially. These include sleep mats, blankets, bands, patches, chairs, and mats. These products are connected via an electrical cord to a grounded outlet, or less commonly, to a grounding pole placed in the earth. Prices vary but are quite reasonable. 3. Earthing in clinic. Health care practitioners can provide treatments to patients while lying on an earthing mat, or can provide in-clinic earthing sessions where patients use grounding products like chairs, mats, and patches.   Conclusion Our modern lifestyles provide us with many benefits, but they also have served to disconnect us from the earth. It is becoming increasingly clear that this may have adverse effects on our health, and conversely, that health can be improved by reconnecting with the “electric nutrition” of the earth in some way. While earthing outdoors is a free and easy way to get grounded, there are many accessible products available that can facilitate this connection. Given the ease and safety of this intervention, it is recommended that everyone incorporate earthing into their routine of health maintenance and disease prevention.  For more information about Fringe light products, go to: https://fringeheals.com/shop-all-products/ References Applewhite R. (2005). The effectiveness of a conductive patch and a conductive bed pad in reducing induced human body voltage via the application of earth ground.” European Biology and Bioelectromagnetics; 1: 23–40. Brown, D., Chevalier, G., & Hill, M. (2010). Pilot study on the effect of grounding on delayed-onset muscle soreness. Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.), 16(3), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2009.0399 Brown, R., Chevalier, G., & Hill, M. (2015). Grounding after moderate eccentric contractions reduces muscle damage. Open access journal of sports medicine, 6, 305–317. https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S87970 Cheng, N., Van Hoof, H., Bockx, E., Hoogmartens, M. J., Mulier, J. C., De Dijcker, F. J., Sansen, W. M., & De Loecker, W. (1982). The effects of electric currents on ATP generation, protein synthesis, and membrane transport of rat skin. Clinical orthopaedics and related research, (171), 264–272. Chevalier G. (2010). Changes in pulse rate, respiratory rate, blood oxygenation, perfusion index, skin conductance, and their variability induced during and after grounding human subjects for 40 minutes. Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.), 16(1), 81–87.  Chevalier G. (2015). The effect of grounding the human body on mood. Psychological reports, 116(2), 534–542. https://doi.org/10.2466/06.PR0.116k21w5 Chevalier, G. (2014). Grounding the human body improves facial blood flow regulation: Results of a randomized placebo controlled pilot study. Journal of Cosmetic, Dermatological Sciences and Applications, 4, 293-308. Chevalier, G. (2015) One-hour contact with the Earth’s surface (grounding) improves inflammation and blood flow – A randomized, double-blind pilot study. Health, 7, 1022-1059. Chevalier, G., Mori, K., & Oschman, J.L. (2006). The effect of Earthing (grounding) on human physiology, European Biology and Bioelectromagnetics, 2(1), 600-621. Chevalier, G., Sinatra, S. T., Oschman, J. L., & Delany, R. M. (2013). Earthing (grounding) the human body reduces blood viscosity-a major factor in cardiovascular disease. Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.), 19(2), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2011.0820 Elkin, H. K., & Winter, A. (2018). Grounding Patients With Hypertension Improves Blood Pressure: A Case History Series Study. Alternative therapies in health and medicine, 24(6), 46–50. Feynman, R., Leighton, R., & Sands, M. (1963). The Feynman Lectures on Physics, vol.II, Addison-Wesley, Boston, Mass, USA.   Ghaly, M., & Teplitz, D. (2004). The biologic effects of grounding the human body during sleep as measured by cortisol levels and subjective reporting of sleep, pain, and stress. Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.), 10(5), 767–776. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2004.10.767 https://earthinginstitute.net/rapid-benefits-an-earthing-1-hour-time-trial/ Just, A. Return to Nature: The True Natural Method of Healing and Living and The True Salvation of the Soul. New York, NY: B. Lust; 1903. Menigoz, W., Latz, T. T., Ely, R. A., Kamei, C., Melvin, G., & Sinatra, D. (2020). Integrative and lifestyle medicine strategies should include Earthing (grounding): Review of research evidence and clinical observations. Explore (New York, N.Y.), 16(3), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2019.10.005 Müller, E., Pröller, P., Ferreira-Briza, F., Aglas, L., & Stöggl, T. (2019). Effectiveness of Grounded Sleeping on Recovery After Intensive Eccentric Muscle Loading. Frontiers in physiology, 10, 35. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00035 Ober C, Sinatra ST, Zucker M.  Earthing: The Most Important Health Discovery Ever? Laguna Beach, Calif, USA: Basic Health Publications; 2010. Ober, C. Grounding the human body to neutralize bioelectrical stress from static electricity and EMF’s. ESD Journal Web site: http://www.esdjournal.com/articles/cober/ground.htm. Accessed June 27th, 2021.  Oschman, J. L., Chevalier, G., & Brown, R. (2015). The effects of grounding (earthing) on inflammation, the immune response, wound healing, and prevention and treatment of chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Journal of Inflammation Research, 8, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S69656 Passi, R., Doheny, K. K., Gordin, Y., Hinssen, H., & Palmer, C. (2017). Electrical Grounding Improves Vagal Tone in Preterm Infants. Neonatology, 112(2), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1159/000475744 Sinatra, S. T., Oschman, J. L., Chevalier, G., & Sinatra, D. (2017). Electric Nutrition: The Surprising Health and Healing Benefits of Biological Grounding (Earthing). Alternative therapies in health and Medicine, 23(5), 8–16. Sokal, K., & Sokal, P. (2011). Earthing the human body influences physiologic processes. Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.), 17(4), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2010.0687 Sokal, K., & Sokal, P. (2011). Earthing the human body influences physiologic processes. Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.), 17(4), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2010.0687 Sokal, P., Jastrzębski, Z., Jaskulska, E., Sokal, K., Jastrzębska, M., Radzimiński, L., Dargiewicz, R., & Zieliński, P. (2013). Differences in Blood Urea and Creatinine Concentrations in Earthed and Unearthed Subjects during Cycling Exercise and Recovery. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2013, 382643. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/382643 White, G. The Finer Forces of Nature in Diagnosis and Therapy. Albuquerque, NM: Sun Publishing; 1929.

Learn more
Red Light Anti-Aging Therapy

Red Light Anti-Aging Therapy

Beauty 911: Red Light Anti-Aging Therapy The anti-aging industry is big business. Like REALLY big business. The global anti-aging market, which includes facial anti-aging skin care products, was worth around 63 billion USD in 2021, and is projected to grow by close to 7% to reach 93 billion USD by 2027. Other anti-aging therapies are also increasingly lucrative, with the Botox market valued at 7.23 billion and the dermal filler market valued at 5.01 billion in 2022. Older women (50 years and older) are considered a “gold mine” for the beauty industry, as they  seek ways to retain a youthful appearance. But it’s not just older women that are using anti-aging products. Advertisers now target women in their 20’s, with claims like “…it’s never too early to start looking after your skin”. Women aged 30-39 made up 18% of Botox procedures and 11% of dermal filler procedures in 2020, with women aged 40-59 making up the majority (57% and 49% respectively). These practices are so common that they are now described as being “a really good and essential thing” that is “ongoing” throughout life.  The anti-aging business is being driven by our societal interest in youthful appearance, and whether this is helpful or harmful is certainly up for debate. Regardless of where you stand on this issue, the truth is that the widespread use of anti-aging therapies is now a well-established fact of modern life. Along with this normalization, there has been a general acceptance of the inherent value of these interventions, as evidenced by consumer spending. What has been lost, however, is the consideration of associated risks, both short and long term.  Anti-aging therapies span a wide range of risk. Products such as lotions and creams are very different than injectable treatments or therapies that ablate the skin. It is the latter that carry risks that should be considered along with the potential benefit of improved appearance. While many of these are medical procedures that require specific training to be legally administered, practitioners have a wide range of expertise that influences the risk of adverse outcomes. And unfortunately, there are an increasing number of unqualified technicians taking advantage of unsuspecting consumers. “Botox Parties” are a real thing, where people gather in an informal setting and get Botox as a group, which can reduce the cost of going to a medical center or spa.  In this article, I will describe the risks of some of the most used anti-aging therapies (including Botox, dermal fillers, chemical and laser peels, and microdermabrasion and dermabrasion) so that consumers can be educated and informed about the real, but rare, potential risks. Botox Botox, more formally known as Botulinum Toxin, is an FDA approved medication used cosmetically to reduce the appearance of wrinkles. It can also be used in higher concentrations to treat medical conditions including migraines, bladder issues, and excessive sweating. Botox is a neurotoxin produced by the bacterium Clostridium botulinum that causes muscle paralysis by blocking the signals from nerves to muscles. There are other botulinum toxin FDA approved medications that work in the same way, including Xeomin, Dysport, Daxxify, Jeuveau, and Myobloc. By blocking the signals from nerves to muscles in the face, the muscles relax, leading to a lessening of wrinkles in certain areas such as the forehead, outer eyes, nasolabial folds, and between the eyebrows. Basically, the muscles are being temporarily inactivated, with the contraction being blocked for as long as the toxin is active. It usually lasts for 3 to 6 months. Rather than complete paralysis of the facial muscles, it is now recommended to use a “neuromodulatory” approach, where the activity of the muscles is reduced but not fully inactive. Botox has a high rate of effectiveness and patient satisfaction. A comprehensive review of 65 randomized clinical trials, with nearly 15,000 subjects, found that Botox decreases wrinkles within four weeks following treatment. It has also been found that up to 90% of people getting Botox are satisfied with treatment outcomes, which improves how they perceive their appearance and their psychological well-being.  Despite these clear benefits, there are some recognized risks to the use of Botox, ranging from minor to severe. Concerningly, although only a small number of adverse events are formally reported to medical regulators, recent research shows that up to 16% of Botox users have “complications”, which suggests that problems are underreported and underrecognized. The following is a list of potential adverse outcomes that should be considered by Botox users: Injection Site Injury – Since a needle is puncturing the skin, there is trauma that can result in injuries including bruising, tenderness, pain, and swelling. These are minor concerns that usually resolve quickly.  Infection – Infection can occur at the injection site due to contamination, which can cause a local reaction or a more serious abscess. Antibiotic treatment may be needed for resolution.  Allergic/Hypersensitivity Reactions – Allergic reactions can be either localized (staying within region of the injection site) or generalized (spreading throughout the body). The latter are much more serious and require medical intervention. Local reactions can usually be managed with antihistamines. Some reactions may be due to silicone oil, which is used as a lubricant to line most syringes. Decreased Sweat Gland Activity – The botulinum toxin can decrease the sweat gland activity in the affected area, which causes localized areas of dry skin. This is a minor side effect that can be treated with moisturizers. Nerve Damage – If the injection causes trauma to nerves in the area it can cause changes in sensation such as tingling or abnormal sensations. This usually resolves on its own as the nerve heals. Vision Problems – Botox injections around the eye area can cause problems including blurred vision, dry eyes, irritation of the cornea, and strabismus (which is when the eyes don’t line up properly). These are rare complications usually caused by improper injection techniques, and which may require treatment from an ophthalmologist. Negative Aesthetic Results – A wide range of undesirable aesthetic outcomes can happen with Botox treatment, which vary depending on the area being injected. Drooping of the upper eyelid is estimated to occur with 1-5% of patients and can last for several weeks. Other undesirable outcomes include eyebrow raising, smile limitations, and asymmetry between the sides of the face. These can last until the toxin wears off. Repeated use of Botox injections over a long period of time can cause permanent changes to facial expression.   Botulism – Botulism is a serious side effect of Botox that can be life threatening. Botulism occurs when the toxin spreads throughout the body, causing muscle weakness, difficulty swallowing, and respiratory failure. Since 2008, Botox and related products have had a black box warning from the FDA that warned of this risk, but citizen safety groups are currently lobbying for a more severe warning to be applied.  Botox Resistance – Also known as “immunoresistance”, Botox resistance occurs when people develop antibodies against the Botox toxin. This can occur in up to 5 to 10% of people who get repeated, high dose Botox injections, although it’s much less common for people using Botox for cosmetic as compared to medical purposes. The antibodies block the response to Botox making the treatment ineffective. Muscle Atrophy – Because Botox partially or completely paralyzes facial muscles, the muscles themselves can atrophy over time. This is especially a problem with repeated injections. Given the increasingly common practice of starting Botox at younger ages, many women may find themselves with weakened atrophied muscles as they get older, which will ultimately prove counterproductive to their pursuit of a youthful appearance. One other concern related to the safety of Botox injections relates to the issue of autoimmune disease. Although the relationship between Botox and autoimmune diseases is unclear, there are anecdotal reports of Botox aggravating or inciting these conditions. As described by acupuncturist Dr. Megan Gray, as a foreign substance, Botox may trigger an already overreactive immune system to be even more reactive, which may create problems. Making the connection between Botox injections and aggravation of the immune system can be very difficult, but it is something people at risk of autoimmune disease should consider as a potential risk.  Dermal Fillers “Fillers” are soft substances that have a gel-like consistency. They are injected under the skin to fill and add volume to spaces in the face and sometimes other areas, like the hands. Adding dermal fillers under the skin has the effect of reducing signs of aging, such as under eye circles, hollowed cheekbones, and wrinkles.  There are several different types of dermal fillers, including natural and synthetic. Natural fillers include hyaluronic acid (Restylane, Juvederm), which is naturally found in the skin and helps with hydration and volume, and calcium hydroxylapatite (Radiesse), which is naturally found in bones. Natural fillers usually last for at least 6 months and then are gradually absorbed by the body. Autologous fat, which is when fat is taken from one area and injected into another, is another type of (natural) dermal filler, as is human collagen. Synthetic fillers include poly-L-lactic acid (Sculptra), which stimulates the body to produce collagen over a period of months after injection, and polymethyl methacrylate (Artefill, Bellafill), which is a semi-permanent filler. Most people report improvement in appearance following injection of dermal fillers. In a study of people getting hyaluronic acid filler, almost 94% reported improvements at month 3 and 76% reported improvement at month 12. People receiving calcium hydroxylapatite filler also report improvements of up to 12 months, as do people receiving synthetic filler.  All dermal fillers are capable of causing complications, with long-lasting synthetic fillers creating more of a risk due to their persistence. According to an analysis of side effects related to complications that have resulted in litigation, the most common are: Swelling – Swelling in the treated area can range from mild to severe. It will usually resolve in hours to a few days but can lead to the area looking “overtreated” while it’s inflamed. Infection – As with Botox, the injection associated with dermal fillers can result in infection, which can vary in severity. Another infection associated complication is the formation of biofilms, which can be difficult to treat.  Allergic/Hypersensitivity Reactions – Allergic/hypersensitivity reactions can occur to dermal fillers but are much more common with synthetic as compared to natural fillers. There are factors that increase the risk of hypersensitivity reactions, such as exposure to viral illness or recent vaccination (such as against Shingles or COVID). Risk of some hypersensitivity reactions is increased when a person carries specific genes that drives the immune response. Nodules – Nodules are the second most reported complaint, next to swelling. Nodules are unintended lumps that can form immediately or have a delayed onset. Delayed onset nodules can even form years after filler injection. Nodules formed from hyaluronic acid can be dissolved with the enzyme hyaluronidase (which breaks down hyaluronic acid), but nodules from synthetic filler are more difficult to treat (and more common).  Negative Aesthetic Results – Nodules can result in negative aesthetic results, but these are not the only cause of poor outcomes. Others include asymmetry between the sides of the face and overfilling, which is most common in the lips and cheeks. Asymmetry can sometimes be fixed by adding more filler to the less filled side, while overfilling with hyaluronic acid filler can be dealt with by injecting the enzyme hyaluronidase. However, overfilling with synthetic fillers is harder to correct, and hyaluronidase breaks down not only the filler but also existing hyaluronic acid, which can be undesirable. Filler can also migrate to other locations, as discussed widely on social media (#lipfillermigration).  Pain – Pain is the third most common reported complaint and is more likely to occur with synthetic filler. Injection of fillers uses larger cannulas, as compared to Botox which uses needles, and these can cause more injection site pain.  Blood Vessel Complications – Dermal filler injections can result in trauma to blood vessels in the area. A rare complication is that fillers can be injected into blood vessels, which can block blood flow. This is a potentially severe outcome that must be diagnosed and treated immediately, or death of the tissue being fed by that blood vessel can occur.  Vision Problems – Dermal fillers can cause vision loss and blindness in rare circumstances. These effects can be permanent, although some people recover fully. Vision problems are usually caused by damage to blood vessels, which allows filler to get in and block the blood vessels that feed the eye. This is mainly a risk when injecting into the eye and forehead areas.   Nerve Damage – Damage to nerves can occur as a result of injection with a canula and can range from minor to severe. Usually, nerve damage will heal but sometimes it is permanent.  Tyndall Effect – The Tyndall effect is when a bluish hue appears within the skin when too much hyaluronic acid filler is placed superficially. It’s caused by scattering of different wavelengths of light when they hit the filler particles. This can appear like a bruise, but it doesn’t resolve within a few days, instead lasting for as long as the filler is present.  Like Botox, dermal filler should only be administered by a certified professional. Dermal fillers can be provided in the US by medical doctors, nurse practitioners, physician’s assistants, registered nurses, dentists (in some jurisdictions), and licensed aestheticians (in a few states). It is crucial that the provider be well trained and experienced, which will help to reduce the risk of negative outcomes.  Chemical Peels Chemical peels are a non-injectable anti-aging therapy in which a chemical solution is applied to the skin which removes the top layers of skin. Since the new skin that grows back is smoother, chemical peels are used to reduce the appearance of wrinkles, minimize scars, treat acne, and improve skin pigmentation.  Chemical peels are either light, medium, or deep. Light peels remove the superficial epidermis of the skin, while medium peels remove both the epidermis and some of the dermis. Deep peels can get even deeper, which is recommended for deep wrinkles and scars. The level of risk of adverse events goes up as the chemical peel gets deeper. Light chemical peels are most helpful for fine wrinkles, uneven pigmentation, and dry skin. The risks of light chemical peels are minor, and include redness, stinging, and skin flaking and irritation. Light peels may also cause acne flare ups, and all peels can activate latent herpes infections, trigger allergic reactions, and alter skin pigmentation.  Medium chemical peels are helpful for deeper wrinkles, acne scars, and uneven pigmentation. With medium chemical peels, in addition to the risks seen with light peels, the redness is more significant and can last up to several months. The effects of medium chemical peels on the skin are similar to a deep sunburn. Medium peels can rarely cause scarring. Deep chemical peels are most helpful for deeper wrinkles, sun damaged skin, scars, and blotchy skin. Deep chemical peels are quite intense and may require a local anesthetic. There are many potential complications, including: peeling, scabbing, redness, flaking and irritation of the skin for up to several months; scarring; and loss of skin pigmentation (potentially permanent). Deep peels that use phenol can also cause heart arrythmia and atrial fibrillation.  Laser Peels Laser peels, also known as laser skin resurfacing, are similar to chemical peels in that the goal is to improve appearance by getting rid of older, damaged skin. While chemical peels use a chemical solution to remove skin, lasers use concentrated light beams to remove damaged skin. Laser peels can reduce the appearance of wrinkles, scars and blemishes. Potential side effects of laser peels are similar to those of chemical peels, and include: infection, scarring, changes in pigmentation, allergic reactions, redness, acne flare ups, and reactivation of herpes infections.  Dermabrasion As with laser and chemical peels, the goal of dermabrasion is to resurface the skin. With dermabrasion, the top layer of the skin is removed using a high speed rotating brush. Dermabrasion can help to reduce the appearance of fine lines and minimize scars. Potential side effects of dermabrasion include reactivation of herpes infections, changes in skin pigmentation (which can be permanent), infections, persistent redness, and thickened skin.   My Story As I approached my late 30’s, I decided to try using Botox and filler to slow down the signs of aging. I actually had no visible lines at the time, and I wanted to keep it that way! Using Botox to prevent lines from developing in the “active” areas of my face, like between my eyebrows and around my eyes, seemed like a good preventive measure. I also noticed that my face seemed to be a bit less plump than when I was younger, which I thought could be improved with dermal filler.  Since this was all new to me, I did my due diligence and looked around for a reputable provider. I learned that people with different qualifications were doing injectable treatments, and I decided that if I was going to do this, I wanted the most highly credentialed therapist I could find: a dermatologist. I chose one who came highly recommended by a friend and set up a consultation. The doctor recommended injection of a small amount of hyaluronic acid filler under my eyes and around my cheekbones, and some Botox between my eyebrows and around my eyes. The Botox was only a tiny bit uncomfortable, but I found the injection of filler (which uses a canula rather than a fine needle), to be unpleasant. It’s not so much that it was painful, but it was strange feeling a canula being moved around in such a delicate area. Since there was a small amount of filler left in the vial after doing my eye and cheekbone area, the doctor suggested that we put this into my lips. I wasn’t too keen, as my lips are already pretty full, and I’d seen enough overfilled lips to be concerned about appearing unnatural. But since I had to pay for the filler regardless, and as the doctor assured me that it was such a small amount that it would barely be visible, I agreed. I was surprised to discover that Botox doesn’t work immediately – you have to wait a couple of days for the effects of the toxin to be seen. And filler can feel a bit hard at first, which scared me as it felt unnatural in my face. It softened within a few days, and the Botox set in, and overall, I was pretty happy with the results. It was super subtle, and I’d say that I just looked a bit more refreshed and rested. I definitely still looked exactly like “me”, just a little bit better, which was my original goal. However, after a month or two I noticed that my eyes seemed to have bags underneath them that had never been there before. And as time went on, it got more noticeable. So much so that I returned to the doctor to discuss my concerns. It turned out that I had filler migration. I don’t recall being told that this was a potential risk, although it may have been part of the small print in the informed consent form. Migration of filler from the tear trough to the orbital area of the eye can apparently occur up to several years after injection.   The recommended solution was to use hyaluronidase to break down the filler. Because hyaluronidase dissolves not only hyaluronic acid filler, but also the body’s own hyaluronic acid, it can reduce volume even further. According to realself.com, when hyaluronidase spreads outside of its zone of injection its outcome can be “somewhat unpredictable”. In people who have been using it for a long time, hyaluronidase reveals the signs of aging as well as the damage caused when filler stretches the skin. Thankfully, since this was my first foray into the filler world, I largely escaped unscathed. However, years later I still have some residual under eye puffiness that I attribute to this ill-fated (and costly) anti-aging experiment. Back to my lips. That little bit of filler there also turned out to be a bad idea. I was looking at a picture of myself a couple of years after the injections and noticed that my smile looked a tiny bit lopsided. Sure enough, my lips were now a little bit uneven. Although patients are told that temporary fillers dissolve, it turns out that sometimes they last for much longer – perhaps even forever. In my case, I suspect that the filler has dissolved unevenly, leaving me with a slight asymmetry between the two sides.  This unfortunate experience let me to do two things. First, I decided to embrace aging. I will wear my life experiences with pride and recognize that happiness will never be found by forcing my body to conform to an unrealistic and ill-conceived idea of beauty. And second, I searched for alternatives to injectable and invasive anti-aging therapies that I knew I could use safely and without concern about adverse outcomes.  Alternative Anti-Aging Therapies Topical Products – There are loads of topical anti-aging products that can safely be used on the skin and that have anti-aging effects. While these aren’t expected to cause dramatic results, many have been shown in clinical research to reduce signs of aging, such as fine lines and uneven skin pigmentation. They include ingredients like vitamin C, niacinamide (vitamin B3), retinol, and tranexamic acid (from the amino acid lysine). Since what goes on your body goes in your body, make sure that all ingredients in your products are safe. The Environmental Working Group’s Skin Deep database is an amazing resource for this – just type in your product and they’ll give you a safety report.   Red Light Therapy – Red light therapy (also known as photobiomodulation) is the application of red light, which is visible as the color red, and/or near infrared light, which is not visible but can be felt as heat. Red light therapy has been shown to be effective for “skin rejuvenation”, including outcomes like increased collagen synthesis, increased elastin production, extracellular matrix regeneration, regulation of oil production, and regulation of the pigment producing cells of the skin. Clinically, these manifest as reduced wrinkles, improved skin appearance, and improved skin pigmentation. Studies show results such as smoother skin; wrinkle reduction and improved skin elasticity; and normalization of skin pigmentation. Most skin rejuvenation studies use both red and near infrared light. Red light therapy has an amazing safety profile and can be used safely by most people, especially at low to moderate intensities.   Cosmetic Acupuncture – Cosmetic acupuncture is acupuncture applied to the face, head and neck. Since acupuncture does involve piercing the skin with needles, there is a small risk of infection, which can be greatly minimized by using safe practices like using sterile needles and disinfecting the skin before treatments. Side effects are extremely rare. Cosmetic acupuncture has been found to improve facial elasticity and restore muscle tone.  Face Yoga – Face yoga involves doing exercises to strengthen the muscles in the face. By increasing muscle mass, the facial atrophy that is associated with aging can be reduced. Although the effects are not dramatic, face yoga has been found to improve measures of facial appearance, particularly cheek fullness. This contrasts with Botox, which is known to cause muscle atrophy because the paralyzed muscle is not being used. There are no risks at all involved with doing face yoga.  Conclusion Author Leo Tolstoy is credited with saying “It is amazing how complete is the delusion that beauty is goodness.” Perhaps this is why the pursuit of youthful beauty goes back to humanity’s earliest civilizations. Exacerbated in the modern world through the digital spotlight of social media, the increasing normalization of altering appearance using anti-aging therapies has led to a diminished consideration of associated risks, which can be significant and life-altering. Fortunately, there are many safer alternatives that have can be used to support natural and graceful aging.  For more information about Fringe light products, go to: https://fringeheals.com/shop-all-products/

Learn more
red light and the sleep quality and endurance performance

red light and the sleep quality and endurance performance

Authors: J. Zhao, Y. Tian, J. Nie, J. Xu, & D. Liu Citation: Journal of Athletic Training (2012); 47(6):673-678 Background: Sleep is a critical component of athletic performance, both in terms of quantity and quality. Similarly, regular exercise is considered a “non-pharmacological” intervention for sleep disorders, and it is generally accepted that physical activity is good for sleep. This is a healthy symbiotic relationship, in which sleep supports exercise and vice versa. Combining exercise with other sleep supporting non-pharmacological interventions, such as light therapy, may be especially important in helping athletes sleep and perform better. Objective: This study investigated whether red light therapy improved the sleep quality and athletic performance of Chinese female basketball players.  Who Was It? A total of 20 athletes participated in this study, 10 in the light therapy group and 10 in the placebo group. What Was Done? The red-light therapy group received 30 minutes of full body red light therapy for 30 minutes each night for 14 days. The placebo group lay in the red-light therapy device for the same time period but did not receive light therapy. Sleep quality, serum melatonin, and athletic performance were assessed before and after the two-week treatment period. What Happened? Some aspects of sleep quality improved with red-light therapy, including levels of daytime dysfunction. Serum melatonin was significantly higher following light therapy, and better sleep quality was correlated with higher levels of serum melatonin. Athletic performance after light therapy was more improved than in the placebo group. Fringe Commentary: This study demonstrated that the use of red-light therapy at night for two weeks improved measures of sleep quality, serum melatonin, and athletic performance in female basketball players. These results suggest that athletes, athletic therapists, and health care providers can use light therapy as a safe, non-pharmacological intervention to support sleep and physical functioning. Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3499892/pdf/i1062-6050-47-6-673.pdf

Learn more